Loading…

A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Daniel is unavailable, but you can change that!

For over one hundred years, the International Critical Commentary series has held a special place among works on the Bible. It has sought to bring together all the relevant aids to exegesis—linguistic and textual no less than archaeological, historical, literary and theological—with a level of comprehension and quality of scholarship unmatched by any other series. No attempt has been made to...

(Mein.) or as son or successor (Jeph., Behr.). Some early Prot. comm. understood עָוֹן as implied, and similarly Fell’s hypothesis (Theol. Quartalschrift, 1892, 355 ff.) of restoring [ואין] אָוֶן ‘and without his own sin,’ so Mar., Löhr, Lamb.; following Jachiades Graetz supplies עֹזֵר ‘helper,’ cft. 11:45. 𝔙 has a remarkable paraphrase, et non erit eius populus qui eum negaturus est (accepted by dEnv., p. 976, as representing the original text!), followed substantially by Montanus, Grot.: non eril
Page 383
Buy this book at Logos.com